FILTER BY:
For the US Food and Drug Administration – Nanoparticles Get Nanoregulation
October 01, 2008
Center for American Progress and Science Progress Senior Fellow Rick Weiss explains why the US FDA’s failure to act on nanofoods puts public health at risk. The original article “Nanoparticles get nanoregulation” is found...
Read More ShareGovernment gives disappointing response to nano workplace risks inquiry
October 01, 2008
The Australian Government has issued its long awaited response to the recommendations of the 2005-06 Senate Inquiry into workplace exposure to toxic dust and nanoparticles. Disappointingly, the Government ignored 2 of the 3 key...
Read More ShareIntergovernmental forum recommends precautionary principle for manufactured nanomaterials
September 01, 2008
Seventy governments, 12 intergovernmental organisations, and 39 non governmental organisations participating in Forum VI of the Intergovernmental Forum on Chemical Safety (IFCS) in Dakar, Senegal last week adopted a statement on nanotechnology and manufactured...
Read More ShareInnovation Review fails innovation test
September 01, 2008
Senator Kim Carr, Minister for Innovation, Industry, Science and Research has released the Review of Australia’s National Innovation System. Far from being a turning point for the future of innovation in Australia, as he...
Read More SharePublic interest the big loser in Qld nano debate
August 01, 2008
Queensland Conservation Council (QCC) and Friends of the Earth (FoE) today warned that tomorrow’s Science in Parliament briefing on nanotechnology, organised by Queensland’s Chief Scientist, shows unacceptable pro-industry bias and ignores nanotechnology’s serious new...
Read More ShareMounting evidence that carbon nanotubes may be the new asbestos – new FoEA review
August 01, 2008
Carbon nanotubes – thin, hollow cylinders made of carbon atoms – look very much like asbestos. In 2004, the United Kingdom’s Royal Society and risk specialists at the world’s second largest reinsurance agent Swiss...
Read More ShareAustralia’s first nano ‘dialogue’ shuts out critics, is industry biased
August 01, 2008
Australia’s first ever attempt to involve members of the public in development of nanotechnology policy is hopelessly compromised, Friends of the Earth said today. The Queensland state government has invited in industry representatives who...
Read More ShareUsing nanotechnology to ‘re-engineer’ our environment? With federal funding??
July 01, 2008
‘Geo-engineering’ is the ultimate in pursuit of high risk ‘techno-fixes’ to the world’s big ecological problems. Its proponents want to use technology to attempt to ‘re-engineer’ the environment, for example by fertilising the ocean...
Read More ShareAsbestos victims’ resource service calls for caution on nanotubes
July 01, 2008
Mesothelioma.com, “the authority on mesothelioma and asbestos cancer”, have published an information sheet that warns that exposure to nanotubes could pose similar risks to those of asbestos. “Current research suggests that exposure to carbon-based...
Read More ShareUS EPA’s voluntary nano-notification scheme a failure
July 01, 2008
Nanotechwire.com news service warns that the US “EPA Nanotechnology Voluntary Program Risks Becoming a ‘Black Hole'”. The service reports that: “Six months after launching its voluntary reporting program for nanomaterial producers, EPA has made...
Read More Share