FILTER BY:
Nano industry expresses frustration with pointless stakeholder dialogue
April 01, 2009
European industry group Cefic has expressed frustration with stakeholder dialogue on nanotechnology. Cefic’s executive director of research and innovation complained that “each discussion begins with a rehearsal of old arguments and fails to move...
Read More ShareMedia Response to Labor Senators voting against the repeal of the CRWMA
March 24, 2009
The Australian Nuclear Free Alliance (ANFA) is appalled by the Senate vote (Thursday 19 March) not to repeal the Commonwealth radioactive Waste Management Act -2005 (CRWMA). Labor Senators voted not to repeal this act, despite it...
Read More ShareQuestioning governments’ role as chief nanotech proponent – a biased adjudicator?
March 01, 2009
When hearing a legal case, in decision making on the board of a major bank or company, and in parliaments around the world, it’s accepted practice to declare any potential conflicts of interest, and...
Read More ShareCalls to protect workers from nano risks
March 01, 2009
ABC Online writes that: “Australian unions and industry are calling for urgent regulation to protect workers from the risks of nanotechnology, while scientists are struggling to keep up the supply of hard data.” Australian...
Read More ShareNanotechnology and the public interest: Repeating the mistakes of GM foods?
March 01, 2009
In an article published in the International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, FoEA’s Georgia Miller argues that governments and industry have learned little from the mistakes they made in GM foods. Lessons inlude...
Read More ShareNanoparticles used in sunscreens, cosmetics, harm next generation – mice studies
March 01, 2009
A study has demonstrated inter-generational harm resulting from exposure to a commonly used nanoparticle, titanium dioxide. A group of Japanese researchers have shown the transfer of nanoparticles from pregnant mice to their offspring, with...
Read More ShareMembers of European Parliament vote for de facto moratorium on nanotech food
March 01, 2009
On 25 March, in the first reading of the new Novel Foods Directive, Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) overwhelmingly voted in favour of setting stringent new rules for the safety assessment of foods...
Read More ShareHigh level EU scientific committee warns of asbestos-like risks of carbon nanotubes
February 01, 2009
The European Commission’s Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) has just released its Risk Assessment of Products of Nanotechnologies. In light of shocking new studies last year finding that carbon...
Read More ShareNano climate manipulation – Germans plan mass nanoparticle ocean dump
January 01, 2009
“Geo-engineering” is a controversial new field where nanotechnology is proposed to artificially manipulate the natural climate to counter the threats of global warming. In the past, the field has attracted scathing criticism from scientists...
Read More Share20 reasons why geo-engineering is a bad idea
January 01, 2009
Plans by a German and Indian research team to dump iron particles in the sea off Chile in the latest ‘geo-engineering’ ocean fertilisation attempt have triggered serious concern. If you’re interested in finding out...
Read More Share