FILTER BY:
Science and democracy – FoE United States at the World Social Forum
January 01, 2009
Joining environmental and social justice campaigners, farmers, Indigenous Peoples, unionists, students, academics and thousands of others, FoE United States nanotechnology and health campaigner Ian Illuminato blogs from the World Social Forum in Belem, Brazil,...
Read More ShareToxic cosmetics? High level British report flags risks of fullerenes
November 01, 2008
A British Royal Commission report to be released today has called for “urgent regulation” to manage the serious toxic risks posed by nanomaterials now in commercial use. The Commission drew particular attention to the...
Read More ShareDialogues around nanotechnology, disconnected from any decision making processes, are pointless.
November 01, 2008
I was recently invited to participate in the 2nd Nanosafety Dialogue for Success, organised by the Directorate-General for Health and Consumers of the European Commission in October 2008 in Brussels. This was one of...
Read More ShareQuestioning nanotechnology’s green hype
November 01, 2008
There is enormous public support for investment in sustainable, renewable energy alternatives to coal or nuclear power. There is also growing support for ‘green’ substitution of toxic chemicals. But all too often industry and...
Read More ShareIgnorance and ubiquity spell recipe for potential disaster
November 01, 2008
On the 12th of November 2008 the Royal Commission’s study of “Novel Materials in the Environment: the case of nanotechnology” was released. The report, while long and detailed, makes shocking reading. Most importantly it...
Read More ShareStudent team wins bronze medal for questioning synthetic biology implications
November 01, 2008
An undergraduate team focused exclusively on the ethical, environmental, economic, social and legal (E3LS) aspects of synthetic biology has won a bronze medal at the international Genetic Engineering Machine/ synthetic biology competition (iGEM). The...
Read More ShareGovernment gives disappointing response to nano workplace risks inquiry
October 01, 2008
The Australian Government has issued its long awaited response to the recommendations of the 2005-06 Senate Inquiry into workplace exposure to toxic dust and nanoparticles. Disappointingly, the Government ignored 2 of the 3 key...
Read More Share96% Australians want safety testing, 92% support labelling nanofoods and food packaging
October 01, 2008
A poll of 1010 people comes as a wake-up call to Australia’s food safety regulator, showing that Australians overwhelmingly want a higher level of risk assessment and transparency in labelling of nano ingredients in...
Read More ShareProposed new Australian food standards will not manage toxic risks of nanofoods
October 01, 2008
For the first time, food companies will have to declare to Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) when their products contain nanotechnology ingredients, additives, food processing aids or contaminants that could pose new toxicity...
Read More ShareFor the US Food and Drug Administration – Nanoparticles Get Nanoregulation
October 01, 2008
Center for American Progress and Science Progress Senior Fellow Rick Weiss explains why the US FDA’s failure to act on nanofoods puts public health at risk. The original article “Nanoparticles get nanoregulation” is found...
Read More Share